5.1 KiB
Scenario catalogue
Scenarios without DIF
J | Epsilon | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | |
Scenario 101 | X | X | ||
Scenario 102 | X | X | ||
Scenario 103 | X | X | ||
Scenario 104 | X | X |
Each scenario has 5 subscenarios:
- A - H0 true
- B - H1 true, effect size 0.2
- C - H1 true, effect size 0.4
- D - H1 true, effect size -0.2
- E - H1 true, effect size -0.4
Scenarios with DIF
J | Epsilon | Nb items DIF | DIF size | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
Scenario 105 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 106 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 107 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 108 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 109 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 110 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 111 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 112 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 113 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 114 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 115 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 116 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 117 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 118 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 119 | X | X | X | X | |||||
Scenario 120 | X | X | X | X |
Each scenario has 7 subscenarios:
- A - H0 true, DIF -0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- MPR example
- B - H1 true, effect size 0.2, DIF +0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- BDI example
- C - H1 true, effect size 0.2, DIF -0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- Dentistry example
- D - H1 true, effect size 0.4, DIF +0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- BDI example
- E - H1 true, effect size 0.4, DIF -0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- Dentistry example
- F - H1 true, effect size -0.2, DIF -0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- Adverse effects example
- G - H1 true, effect size -0.4, DIF -0.3/0.5 on traitement group
- Adverse effects example
Confusion simulation details
8 covariates are simulated for each scenario, each defined by their odds ratio on treatment and odds ratio on outcome:
OR_TT^X: Odds ratio describing the increase in probability of patients being treated when covariate X is positive.
OR_Y^X: Odds ratio describing the increase in average outcome when covariate X is positive.
Covariates are simulated as in Sturmer et al, 2021:
Variables | OR_TT^X | OR_Y^X |
---|---|---|
X_1 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
X_2 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
X_3 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
X_4 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
X_5 | Epsilon | Epsilon |
X_6 | 1.5 x Epsilon | 1.5 x Epsilon |
X_7 | 1.0 / 10 | 1.0 / 10 |
X_8 | 1.0 / 0.1 | 1.0 / 10 |
X_1 and X_2 are thus Instrumental variables, X_3 and X_4 are Risk factors for the outcome and X_5 and X_6 are Confounders.
X_7 and X_8 are unobserved tail-end cofounders indicating rare treatment decisions for extreme propensity score values in each group. Untreated patients with very high propensity of treatment will be very likely to have X_7=1 (patients that should have been treated but weren't due to frailty). Treated patients with very low propensity of treatment will be very likely to have X_8=1 (patients that should not have been treated but were due to severe condition).
For each replication, observed covariates explained treatment with an AUC drawn randomly between 0.65 and 0.85 (average: 0.75).